But what about the fish? Ecotoxicology and anaesthesia | Association of Anaesthetists

But what about the fish? Ecotoxicology and anaesthesia

But what about the fish? Ecotoxicology and anaesthesia

GettyImages-1287429258

Few anaesthetists can forget the unique pleasure of memorising the many different metabolites, effects, and clearance rates of anaesthetic drugs. However, once they have been excreted or disposed of, our understanding of their fate and environmental impact is much more limited, if we even consider them at all.

However, if we are to achieve the goal of providing environmentally sustainable healthcare then we must start to pay attention to these effects. The field of ecotoxicology, which emerged in the 1970s, examines the adverse consequences that substances have on the ecosystems into which they are released. These include toxicity (potential to poison organisms), persistence (ability to resist degradation), and bioaccumulation (accumulation within organisms); with regard to drugs, this will also include metabolites.

If we look beyond volatiles, many other drugs that we give to patients have the potential to cause environmental harm.

Besides excretion by the patient, pharmaceuticals may also be disposed of directly into the environment. In the UK, hospitals are obliged to incinerate pharmaceutical waste, but that purchased by the public can easily enter household waste. Even within hospitals, the disposal of pharmaceuticals can still bypass mandated pathways, resulting in their passage to the environment.

The obvious target for reducing the environmental impact of anaesthesia is that of anaesthetic gases. However, if we look beyond volatiles, many other drugs that we give to patients have the potential to cause environmental harm. When discussing the use of total intravenous anaesthesia as a less carbon-intense choice, one might hear the refrain “…but what about the fish?”

Propofol has been detected in surprising places: drinking water; the tissues of fish; and even volatile emissions from textile floor coverings 

How much of a problem is ecotoxicity? Should we be worried about the fish, and by extension, our ecosystems? We know that a variety of pharmaceuticals enter our ecosystems [1]; they can then cause various problems affecting humans (a rise in multi-drug resistant organisms linked to antimicrobial agents [2]) and animals (feminisation of male fish from exposed to contraceptive hormones).

Within anaesthesia, propofol is one of the most widely used, and wasted, drugs. Propofol has been detected in surprising places: drinking water; the tissues of fish; and even volatile emissions from textile floor coverings [3]. It does not biodegrade and it accumulates in adipose tissue. Testing has found toxic effects on a large range of species including algae, crustaceans and freshwater fish [4]. While the risk to the environment from propofol is rated ‘low’, at present there is little data on the amount of propofol entering and remaining in our ecosystems, and the effects of chronic exposure.

Recognising that our understanding of the potential ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals entering ecosystems is extremely limited, many researchers are calling for a precautionary approach. This aims to reduce unnecessary or ineffective pharmaceutical use, while collecting more evidence. With this in mind, perhaps anaesthetists should consider this along with the pharmacology required for safe and effective drug administration.

Anaesthetists might also lend their expertise to the growing field of ecotoxicology, so that we can answer the question, "…but what about the fish?"

Chris Allen
Association of Anaesthetists and Centre for Sustainable Healthcare
Fellow in Environmentally Sustainable Anaesthesia
StR in Anaesthesia
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle

Ian Baxter
Consultant Anaesthetist
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle 

Odunayo Oyedele
Jo Childs

Medical Students
Newcastle University Medical School 

Twitter: @Chris_Allen_85; @Dr_IanBaxter

References 

  1.  Fent K, Weston AA, Caminada D. Ecotoxicology of human pharmaceuticals. Aquatic Toxicology 2006; 76: 122–59. 
  2. Kraemer SA, Ramachandran A, Perron GG. Antibiotic pollution in the environment: from microbial ecology to public policy. Microorganisms 2019; 7: 180. 
  3. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Compound summary. Propofol, 2020. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Propofol (accessed 20/1/2021). 
  4. AstraZeneca. Environmental risk assessment data. Propofol, 2017. www.astrazeneca.com/content/dam/az/our-company/Sustainability/2017/Propofol.pdf (accessed 20/1/2021).

You might also be interested in: