The anaesthetic workforce – a SAS perspective | Association of Anaesthetists

The anaesthetic workforce – a SAS perspective

Box 1

New SAS contracts

Specialty Doctor (2021)
The updated Specialty Doctor contact. Changes include new protections against excessive out-of-hours working, and to the definition of ‘standard’ working hours. Progression through the ‘higher’ pay threshold requires ‘increasing ability to take decisions and carry responsibility without direct supervision’ and contribution to a wider non-clinical role. 

Eligibility: 

  • Full registration and a Licence to Practice with the General Medical Council 
  • At least four years’ full-time postgraduate training (or equivalent gained on a part-time or flexible basis) 
  • At least two years of which is in a specialty training programme in anaesthesia or a relevant specialty (or equivalent experience and competencies) 

Specialist
The new ‘senior’ SAS role, the first since the Associate Specialist role closed to new entry in 2009. Doctors working as Specialists are expected to be able to work ‘independently’, in a potentially narrower niche than a consultant. 

Eligibility:

  • Full registration and a Licence to Practice with the General Medical Council 
  • A minimum of twelve years’ medical work (either continuous period or in aggregate) since obtaining a primary medical qualification 
  • A minimum of six years of which is in a relevant specialty in the Specialty Doctor and/or closed SAS grades (or equivalent years’ experience from other medical grades including from overseas) 
  • Meets the criteria set out in the Specialist grade generic capabilities framework

The anaesthetic workforce – a SAS perspective

In early 2021, new contracts for SAS doctors were launched in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (Box 1). In this article we describe the alternative career pathway that these contracts provide, and hopefully convince you that recognising and developing this pathway is an important part of future workforce strategy.

The current workforce

Anaesthetists who are neither consultants nor in a formal training programme accounted for more than 2500 doctors, or approximately 20% of anaesthetists, in the 2020 RCoA medical workforce census report [1]. Doctors find themselves in this group for a variety of reasons. It may be temporary as some of these doctors may choose to re-renter a formal training programme, or more permanent. This group is often treated as one cohort, but is more usefully considered as two, that is ‘SAS doctors’ and ‘Locally-Employed Doctors’.

Coming first to SAS doctors, these are mostly permanent members of their departments working on nationally agreed contracts. They have contractual rights to a job plan, SPA time and pay progression. For the majority, this is their career. Most of these doctors currently working are ‘Specialty Doctors’, which was the only national SAS contract available for new entrants between 2009 – 2021. The ‘Associate Specialist’ and ‘Staff Grade’ contracts are both now closed to new entrants, but there are still many of these doctors in employment. The new senior role for SAS doctors of ‘Specialist’ was part of the 2021 contract package, and there are also now a handful of recently-appointed SAS Specialists.

We appear to have accepted at some point as a profession that doctors in this part of the workforce would not be offered the national contract for their work. 

The second group are Locally-Employed Doctors. Members of this broad group have a myriad of titles, including ‘Clinical Fellow’ and ‘Trust Doctor’. These doctors work under the terms of Trust-derived contracts, often based on a version of the trainee contract. These jobs are frequently short term, and without the permanence or contractual protections enjoyed by SAS doctors. Across all specialties, this group of doctors is the single most rapidly rising part of the workforce. Some of these doctors are on planned short-term posts outside formal training, gaining specific competencies or clinical experience, before resuming training or applying for a consultant role.

However, many others are now in this position longer-term. In the opinion of the authors at least, it would be more appropriate for the latter group of doctors to be employed as Specialty Doctors. We appear to have accepted at some point as a profession that doctors in this part of the workforce would not be offered the national contract for their work. This is deeply concerning, and ought to be discussed far more than at present.

Since the census was published, changes to the training programme have created an additional group of CT3- equivalent doctors who are also temporarily outside of formal training, and on Trust-based contracts. It is possible that, for the first time, the number of locally-employed anaesthetists now exceeds the number of SAS anaesthetists in the UK.

The alternative pathway

The new contracts outlined above create an obvious, and very viable alternative pathway to a more conventional medical career. A doctor currently working as a clinical fellow might, for example, become a Specialty Doctor. While working as a Specialty Doctor, it should be normal for this doctor to acquire experience, knowledge and skill, and to develop into an independent, expert anaesthetist within their clinical niche. This doctor should then have the opportunity to have this progression recognised by applying for a Specialist post when they meet the required criteria. Forward-thinking departments could even anticipate future workforce gaps and develop future senior colleagues to fill those gaps. Support for this route should now be a normal expectation of being a Specialty Doctor. Alternatively some doctors may choose to gather the evidence required to enter the Specialist Register by CESR in order to apply for a Consultant post. This too should be facilitated.

For the promise of this pathway to be fully realised, these doctors must be supported to develop, and these contracts must be used appropriately. It is important that we reverse the trend of this cohort of doctors being inadequately recognised and rewarded for the work they do. As previously discussed, there are a considerable number of locally-employed doctors who would meet the eligibility to be Specialty Doctors. There are also a number of experienced Specialty Doctors who meet the eligibility and fulfil a role that would be more appropriately badged as Specialists. This needs to now be recognised and addressed, with these doctors being facilitated into the appropriate contracts for their work.

If we truly care about the future of the workforce and retention of every anaesthetist, strengthening this alternative pathway must form part of the long term strategy within the Specialty.

Doctors must be supported to develop their careers within a SAS role, and progression must be recognised when it has occurred. To borrow a phrase from psychiatry, SAS careers need ‘parity of esteem’ with a more conventional medical career. The trope that SAS doctors are ‘just for service’ is historical, inaccurate, and goes against multiple national publications relating to the grade. It is also counterproductive, as denying SAS doctors the opportunity to reach their full potential self-evidently comes at a greater eventual cost to the service.

There is a workforce crisis across the whole specialty. The RCoA Anaesthesia – fit for the future report in 2021 revealed that 25% of consultants and 20% of SAS anaesthetists are planning to leave the NHS in the next five years [2]. The 2020 Census stated that over 90% of departments had at least one consultant vacancy. The real gap, taking account of the extra anaesthetists that would be required to meet demand, was 11.8% for consultants and 18.4% for SAS doctors. SAS anaesthetists are an essential part of the solution to this problem, and they deserve appropriate recognition and respect. By developing this cohort, the number of future senior doctors does not need to be tied entirely to the number of training posts. If we truly care about the future of the workforce and retention of every anaesthetist, strengthening this alternative pathway must form part of the long term strategy within the Specialty. This is a workforce issue.

Rob Fleming
Specialty Doctor Anaesthetist
Elected Board Member and Chair of SAS Committee 

Emma Wain
Associate Specialist Anaesthetist
Elected Board Member

Twitter: @RobJimFleming; @Anaes_SAS

References 

  1. Royal College of Anaesthetists. Medical Workforce census report 2020, 2020. https://rcoa.ac.uk/training-careers/working-anaesthesia/workforce-planning/medical-workforce-census-report-2020 accessed 16/2/2022. 
  2. Royal College of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia – fit for the future, 2021. https://rcoa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/documents/2021-09/Respected_valued_retained2021_0. pdf accessed 16/2/2022.

Further reading

You might also be interested in: