Pulse oximetry and
racial bias - the tip of
the iceberg…?
The COVID-19 pandemic was a defining moment in history that will have long-lasting
effects on healthcare systems. Shortly after the pandemic began, the death of George
Floyd in 2020 sparked one of the biggest global social uprisings in recent years, which
continues today. The collision of the pandemic and the Black Lives Matter protests
brought the issue of systemic inequality and systemic racism to the fore, and highlighted
the vast health inequalities faced by minority groups across the UK
Data from the Office for National Statistics show that Black
people were four times more likely to die from COVID-19 than
their White counterparts [1]. These might have been explained
away as a consequence of socio-economic disparities, but once
these differences are accounted for Black people are still twice as
likely to die from COVID-19 infection [1].
In November 2021, the then-Health Secretary, Sajid Javid
ordered a review of medical devices in relation to any racial bias,
saying "It's unintentional but it exists… and the reason is that a
lot of these medical devices, even some of the drugs, some of
the procedures, some of the textbooks, most of them are put
together in majority-white countries and I think this is a systemic
issue around this." The results of this, ‘The Whitehead review’ are
still awaited.
The pulse oximeter is an essential device used across healthcare
from assessment in primary care to hospital wards. It is also a vital
monitor in anaesthetic rooms, operating theatres and intensive
care. Medical students and anaesthetists are usually taught that
poor peripheral perfusion, cold peripheries, fingernail polish,
dyshaemoglobinaemias, intravenous dyes and misplacement
may be the cause for inaccuracies in pulse oximeter traces and
readings. Skin colour is rarely raised as an issue.
The evidence however seems clear; occult or ‘hidden’
hypoxaemia, defined as SaO2
< 88% with SpO2
≥ 92% recorded
at the same time, is significantly increased in non-White skin.
First identified as an issue in 1990, Jubran and Tobin found that
“A pulse oximeter target of 92% ensured a safe arterial oxygen
tension (PaO2) greater than 8 kPa in 91.7% of White patients,
but in only 50% of our Black patients” [2]. The literature has
exploded since the pandemic. Black patients have consistently
been found to have significantly higher rates of occult
hypoxaemia compared to White counterparts [3] and the risk
of occult hypoxemia is most significant in Black patients with
SpO2 93-96% [4]. A retrospective review of the Extracorporeal
Life Support Organization registry demonstrated that in patients
about to be initiated onto ECMO, the prevalence of occult
hypoxaemia was higher in Black patients (21.5%) compared with
White (10.2%) [5]. Similarly, the rates of intra-operative occult
hypoxaemia are significantly increased in patients self-reporting
as Black (2.1%) or Hispanic (1.8%) compared with patients selfreporting as White (1.1%) [6].
This is a not-inconsequential measurement error. Patients
with occult hypoxaemia have higher rates of organ
dysfunction 24-hrs later and higher in-hospital mortality [4].
This measurement bias has been associated with a delay in
recognising patients’ eligibility for COVID-19 treatment, with
minority racial and ethnic groups being most affected [7].
Part of the problem appears to be the calibration and validation
of pulse oximeters. Since 2013, the US FDA has required the
study population to include at least 15% people with diverse skin
pigmentation, or two individuals with darkly pigmented skin. This
sampling does not reflect the US 2010 population census that
recorded Asian (5.9%), Black (13.4%), Hispanic (18.5%) and White
(60.1%). If an FDA-approved pulse oximeter reads 90%, the true
oxygen saturation could be anywhere between 86-94% [8].
Pulse oximetry however, is not the only variable under scrutiny.
The NHS Race and Health Observatory (RHO), an independent
body founded in April 2021 that examines ethnic health
inequalities with the aim of eradication, reported a 4-times higher
maternal death rate in Black women and a 40% higher death rate
from coronary heart disease in South Asian Britons. The list goes
on; we can no longer afford to duck this issue.
Structural racism results in poorer health outcomes. The
intersection of the pandemic and social justice movements has
created a new and impassioned endeavour for the abolishment
of ethnic health inequalities. We need to recognise the systemic
and historical foundations upon which modern medicine, research
and medical education are built and the wider inequalities to
which these lead. Without this we cannot embark upon positive
change for all. We cannot be to blame for the system that we have
inherited, but it is our responsibility to reflect upon our privileges,
be more anti-racist and demand change. What else in clinical
practice are we unconscious of? How can we reduce the known
inequalities that exist? Organisations such as the NHS RHO are
vital in driving positive change, and the findings of the Whitehead
review into medical devices and pulse oximetry are eagerly
awaited.
Ben Hylton
ST6 Intensive Care Medicine
Severn Deanery
References
- Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus (COVID-19) related deaths by ethnic group, England and Wales: 2 March 2020 to 15 May 2020, 2020. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/ birthsdeathsandmarriages /deaths/articles/ coronaviruscovid19relateddeathsbyethnicgroupenglandandwales/ 2march2020to15may2020 (accessed 11/8/2023).
- Jubran A, Tobin MJ. Reliability of pulse oximetry in titrating supplemental oxygen therapy in ventilator-dependent patients. Chest 1990; 97: 1420–5.
- Sjoding M, Dickson RP, Iwashyna TJ, Gay SE, Valley TS. Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement. New England Journal of Medicine 2020; 383: 2477-8
- . Wong A-KI, Charpignon M, Kim H, et al. Analysis of discrepancies between pulse oximetry and arterial oxygen saturation measurements by race and ethnicity and association with organ dysfunction and mortality. JAMA Network Open 2021; 4: e2131674.
- Valbuena VSM, Barbaro RP, Claar D, et al. Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement among patients about to undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 2019-2020: a retrospective cohort study. Chest 2022; 161: 971-8.
- Burnett GW, Stannard B, Wax DB, et al. Self-reported race/ethnicity and intraoperative occult hypoxemia: a retrospective cohort study. Anesthesiology 2022; 136: 688-96.
- Fawzy A, Wu TD, Wang K, et al. Racial and ethnic discrepancy in pulse oximetry and delayed identification of treatment eligibility among patients with COVID-19. JAMA Internal Medicine 2022; 182: 730-8.
- U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Pulse oximeter accuracy and limitations: FDA safety communication, 2022. https://www.fda.gov/ medical-devices/safety-communications/pulse-oximeter-accuracyand-limitations-fda-safety-communication (accessed 17/8/2023).